Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 11:34
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Aston Martin announce Stroll to miss Spanish Grand Prix - F1
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Eyeglasses With Built-In Hearing Aids: This Just Makes Sense - WSJ
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
How are max different from medical and minimum security prisons?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Where do high school kids get weed from?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
If sea levels were rising, wouldn't the acreage of coastal salt marshes increase? Are they?
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
‘Black Swan Event’ Could Trigger 25% Drop in Alphabet Stock, Warns Barclays - TipRanks
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
How likely do TWS earbuds explode these days? I'm still using wired earbud because I'm paranoid.